Observations of the Fox

 If you're linked to me on various social media platforms, you've probably seen these. They're some of the preliminary page layouts I've been working on over the past couple of weeks. If you had read through the How to Run a Game series that I did back in February, or if you've purchased a copy of The Law , you'll probably recognise a few elements found in these page layouts. I'm basically trying to up the ante on those ideas for the Walkabout project. There's also a bit of overlap with the Walkabout blog that I was writing a decade ago, because I still really want to write the whole game in the form of a graphic novel, or at least a format that is more graphically than textually oriented. I might keep the old character's names, but now the red-headed member of the group is the narrator/GM/oracle, while there are four players (two male and two female). We'll follow through a few key elements of game play as we follow players making a few differ

   

Australian Indigenous initiation rites have always been mysterious to outsiders. Even this academic paper written in 1899 where the writer met with aboriginal people still conducting the ceremony had trouble ascertaining details of the event. (As an interesting aside, the rituals indicated in this paper occurred only a couple of hours drive away from where I currently live, so it's tempting to visit the sites referred to). Varying initiation rites have been recorded , but for the most part there has been over a century of elders being killed before knowledge could be passed from one generation to the next, children being stolen and indoctrinated into the ways of a new culture without the opportunity to learn the traditions of their people, and "complications" from government agencies if physical signs of initiation (such as lost teeth, missing finger joints, piercings, or scarification) were detected. Without the physical signs of initiation and dedication, or the passin

Here's where things get delicate. The fine line ensuring things are sensitive rather than a caricature is always going to be in a different place for different people. However, based on my discussions with various members of Indigenous communities over the years, a lot of this can be mitigated by ensuring everyone understands the way the game works, the narrative structure, and the way it attempts to development a liminal space in which communal storytelling occurs. That's a heavy start to a post, but if you've read through my How to Run a Game series it should make sense.  We're not trying to co-opt or appropriate the stories of the past, but to create new stories that reflect current issues and cultural morality standards. Walkabout doesn't critique the Indigenous culture, but draws inspiration from it, as well as considering the complexity of situations and how they might be impacted by a hypothetical situation. Our hypothetical situation is a blend of science,

One of the things about post-apocalyptic stories is that you don't know what will be valuable, or what might drive the narrative. However, there are a few key things to consider when deciding what types of items might become more valuable. I've already mentioned the idea that useful items will probably play a significant role in the story, but quite often in post-apocalyptic stories the key items that have sentimental value. In Walkabout, one of the key ideas I had from the beginning was that trade only tends to occur on a local scale. Most settlements are generally self-sufficient, scavenging what they need from if they can't make it. However this limits available options. If a car needs tyres, and there's no more tyres of the right size, someone will need to modify the car to fit the tyres that are available. If someone wants a cup of coffee, and there's no more coffee around, there aren't many coffee plantations in Australia, and imports are no longer common.

  In Walkabout, I'm suggesting that a really nice stick might count as a piece of equipment, but so might a nomadic convoy rig filled with everything you need to survive weeks away from civilization. There is no way that these two pieces of equipment could be considered equivalent in power. What are the advantages of the stick...? You can poke someone with it. You can reach further with it. You can attach it to some string or line to make a trap or fishing line. You can use it to mix ingredients. What are the advantages of the nomadic convoy rig? You can shelter within it during inhospitable weather. You can get places more quickly. You can gather with several allies in relative safety. You are protected from gunfire while in it. You can grow crops in a hydroponics bay You have storage areas for other pieces of equipment  If might have a built in med-bay, or workshop. It may have it's own story and reputation. Those last few  in bold  are probably the important ones. So that ki