Observations of the Fox

   8-bit gaming...actually, I think the colour range above is closer to 16-bit gaming. When I started working on this idea, it was called BYOM (Bring Your Own Miniatures), because I knew I wouldn't have the resources to release a range of miniatures to go with a wargame (or even a skirmish game), and because I've got heaps of minis from companies that have gone bust, or simply one-off minis from indepedent producers who never had their own rule set to work with. I wanted to make a fun set of rules that worked on a basic grid, where players could bring their minis from a variety of genres to explore a variety of settings and scenarios.  It's still a valid idea, but these days players could 3d-print their own minis and terrain, or still buy stuff from assorted vendors who are designing a wide array of interesting stuff. I've seen so many new terrain and miniature manufacturers in recent years that I've thought about revisiting this concept. I had been looking (a few y...

Not long after my last post, I read this article called " The Coin Don't Have No Say ", there's some interesting stuff in the piece, even if if does take a while to get there. It kind of reflects a few of the ideas that we had a long time ago, but I'll get to that shortly. First a continuation of the Three-Way Tension.   I'm basically going to be reflecting and rationalising on my experiences of how the three agendas of the GNS structure are often employed by the three elements of the tension. The next post will delve into how these agendas flavour the tension, and how this make some tensions work with the flow of the session to add focus to what is being achieved, while other combinations of tension can potentially be disruptive. I can't really get to that side of things, until I explain the next layer of the framework.  The GM/Narrator The GM/Narrator facilitates the session. In traditional play, this participant chooses the scenario that the players w...

A few years ago, I was developing a concept called Voidstone Chronicles . There's a bit of work about it here on the blog. The general idea was to replicate some 8-bit gaming in a miniatures format. I was thinking " Golden Axe " or even advancing to the earliest incarnations of Diablo . Getting a decent process for my 3D printing at the moment has opened up some opportunities for revisiting that idea. Now I've just got to dig through some of my old posts and old files and sort through them to work out what is still viable and what can be resculpted into a game that fits the vision. I'll probably share a bit more of that stuff, and the terrain building process, and how I'll be preparing that for use on the table.  

      The above picture is from the SNAFU cookbook, which is full of symbols describing various parts of play and how they interact with one another to create the experience of a TTRPG session. The last post generated a bit os discussion on the socials (but not here, so I can't really archive what's been said without extensive cutting, pasting, and screenshots), so it's time to delve a bit deeper into the way I understand TTRPGs to work. Remember that this is my observations, archived and written down, your mileage may vary.  Crystallisation for Vcetor Theory and the 3-Way Tension model occurred during a BBQ I cooked for three Norwegians in my home at the time in southwestern Sydney. The meal I cooked was kangaroo and salad, the guests were  Matthijs Holter (designer of Archipelago , here's his  itch page ), Ole Peder Giæver (designer of Itras By ) and I want to say the last visitor was  Martin Bull Gudmundsen (co-designer of Itras By). I think it was...

It might be easy to say that Forge terminology has become muddied over the years, however as a linguistic descriptivist rather than a prescriptivist, I'll be vocal in saying that it was always muddy. Yes, there were prescriptivists who claimed that there was a correct and narrow definition of the terms, but there were always people using the words in their own interpretations. Sometimes there would be definitions of the words that reflected their usage in more common parlance, sometimes there would be some other contextual spin on the terms. The gatekeeping was problematic, especilly when two people would be talking across each other because they couldn't agree on the basic semantics of what each other were saying.This whole situation is a shame, because there were some really interesting ideas raised back then, especially on the "Forge adjacent" forums. Taken directly from the Provisional Glossary (which is now over 20 years old), three of the biggest takeaways from...

The last time I responded to someone's ideas about TTRPG theory, it got a bit of traction... if not here, then across several of the social media platforms I'm linked to.     This is a really interesting set of ideas, and it was relatively dismissed on the TTRPG Design Community forum where it was posted. At the time of my screenshot, the majority of the comments indicated something along the lines of "That's certainly an opinion" or "You seem to have a narrow understanding of specific TTRPGs", but comments like that are pretty dismissive. It's got some merits, and yes, while it is an opinion, and while it does reflect a specific style of game, there are some elements that can be delved into.   It's a complex take, and probably akin to the sorts of things I'm often writing here. People look at it ad they say "I agree with this bit, but I don't agree with that...however since the ideas I like and the ideas I don't like seem to be ...