The FUBAR rewrite - Conflicts
A few more sidebar elements to help explain the rules, this time focusing on the types of conflict that might be found in a FUBAR story.
I might expand this social conflict element, I'm not sure yet.
Dada
Alice makes a comment during the course of play about surveillance
cameras turning to watch the moves of the lowlifes, and their actions displayed
on nearby TV screens (like in the movies), and Jenny thinks that might make a
really interesting addition to the story. Taking inspiration from unexpected
sources, then trying to combine them into a narrative that meanders between the
real and the surreal is what the game is all about. She jots this down on a
note.
At a later time in the story, a time occurs when this might
be a good fit. Frog is a rogue who
has been revealed, but who hasnāt been adequately dealt with by the lowlifes so
far, and Jenny figures that he might make a good antagonist responsible for these
digital hijinx, and since Frog is
related to Mr Norrington, then the
group of lowlifes with him will suffer the consequences of the event. Two
secret tokens are spent so that everyone present can try to detect whatās
happening, then a third is added to raise the tension (if any sacrifices result
from the event, theyāll be worse), the Russian Mafia thugs chasing the
characters at this point of the story might be alerted to their exact
whereabouts. But a success might allow them to identify what happening, and
prevent things from getting too out of hand.
Multi-Character
Opposed Actions
During play so far, it has been established that Hasani and Preacher have been enemies for a while, stemming back to a repo job
that Hasani conducted on the cult Preacher is a part of, this rivalry has
only ever escalated over the past couple of years (they are now considered
tightly related enemies with no favours owed). When they encounter one another
on the street, even just in passing, fireworks flare. Jenny spends three secret
tokens to reflect the cult members that surround Preacher, she doesnāt want it to be too easy for Hasani. Preacher would love to capture Hasani
to make him pay for years of perceived threats to the cult. Hasani, just wants to defuse the
situation until he can get back-up. Hasani is adding āBluffā to his roll (with
āPhysically Imposingā and a āGunā he found as traits adding to the result),
Preacher has nothing to add to his roll (but has he three secret tokens worth
of cultists to add to his result). Rolls are made.
Ben rolls a 2, 2, 4, and 5 for Hasani. He allocates the 5 to success so that he can get the
benefit from being āphysically imposingā. A 4 in Sacrifice is a minor
sacrifice, and in opposed actions it usually easier to just apply this as a
bonus success to the opponent (or cancel out any sacrifice they might get). A 2
in story means that Jenny will be describing the outcome of Hasaniās actions.
Jenny rolls a 3, 4, and 6 for Prophet. She allocates the 6 to success to gain the benefit from
the cultists. A 4 in Sacrifice is another minor sacrifice so Jenny just cancels
out the two sacrifices to make things quicker and easier. A 3 in story means
that Ben and Jenny will share narrative responsibilities for that side of the
conflict.
The total outcome has two successes directed from Hasani to Preacher, and four successes directed back from Preacher to Hasani. Hasaniās successes are used to scare off some of Preacherās cultists (eliminating two of Preacherās bonus traits), but not before
Preacherās successes cause Hasani to be āheavily mobbedā (-2
negative trait for the remainder of the scene) by members of the public, while
also having his āphysically Imposingā trait neutralised for the same reasons. Preacherās last success cancels one of Hasaniās successes (and thus he only
loses one bonus trait from the cultists). Things really arenāt looking good for
Hasaniā¦if heās lucky heāll be able to
withdraw from the scene safely, if heās not lucky, the other lowlifes might
spend an upcoming scene rescuing him.
Conflict (Physical)
In a dark alley
perpetually shaded by skyscrapers, lined with dumpsters and littered with
rubbish two figures face off against one another. Alonzo Jones, non-descript in
a dark hoody and jeans, and Agent Lincoln in a dark off-the-rack suit,
trenchcoat shifting in the alleywayās faint breeze. Both pull pistols, Alonzoās
a custom piece unlike anything else in the city, Lincolnās a government-issue
sidearm.
āIt doesnāt have to be
this way, boyā.
āWe were framedā
āWe can let the courts
decide thatā
āThe courts are corrupt. Iām not going in.ā
Shots echo in the
canyon of concrete, steel and glass.
During the course of play it has been established that Alonzo and Lincoln have a loose relationship. The alley is a tight and
confined location (a beneficial āconfinedā trait is applied to the alley), so both
combatants get an extra success to hit their opponent. Carl rolls 4 dice for
Alonzo (three dice plus one for āshootā); 2,2,4,6. Jenny also rolls four dice
(three plus one for āsubdueā); 1,4,6,6.
Carl allocates Alonzoās
6 to success, 4 to sacrifice and 2 to story. With extra positives due to
the loose relationship, the 3d printed dart pistol, and the location Alonzo deals
damage worth four successes. Since the Oracle is describing the outcome, Jenny
declares that Agent Lincoln has taken a few hits causing him to be heavily
injured (-2 penalty) for the remainder of the story (covering the other two
points). The minor sacrifice equates to āLow Ammoā on Alonzoās gun, a second
one of these means Alonzo will need to find another means of dealing damage if
he wants to stay in the fight.
Jenny allocates Agent Lincolnās 6 to success, 6 to sacrifice
and 4 to story. With bonus traits from relationship and location, Lincoln deals
damage worth 3 successes (with no sacrifice). Jenny assigns Alonzo a heavy
injury (-2) for the short term, but Agent Lincoln still has plenty of ammo.
If another round of combat occurs, itās quite likely that at
least one of these two will end up incapacitated.
Conflict (Social)
In a greasy truck stop on the outskirts of town, Mt Norrington
is meeting up with his old adversary, the computer hacker who goes by the name
of Frog. Some dice are rolled to determine the relationship before Frog walks
through the door. Itās a close relationship (6) , where neither side has the
upper hand (4), and Alice gets to decide how Norrington and Frog are related
(5), she decides that sheāll make this interesting. Norrington knew Frog as
Susan when they were going out in college, it was a messy break up.
āSusanā
āNo one calls me that anymore,
itās Frogā
āWhy Frog?ā
āWhy Not.ā
āWhat brings you here?
You know this is my side of town.ā
āBest dirty burgers in townā¦besides,
I wanted to tell you to walk away from your current job.ā
āWhy? Are you
connected to it?ā
āYou donāt need to know, but itās
going to get you hurt.ā
Itās a quiet location, and Jenny mentions that there are a
few cops having a bite. If things escalated to violence it could get very messy
very quickly, for both Norrington and Frog, they decide to keep it civil. If
things go well Norrington might even turn Frog into an ally for the remainder
of the story.
Like physical conflict, each character rolls dice to see
what advantages they might get from the situation (their success result), what
they might accidentally give away (their sacrifice) and who describes what
happens. The problem here is that neither Norrington nor Frog is particularly
social, possibly one of the reasons why they broke up. Alice rolls 4 dice (she
is adding Norringtonās Negotiation action); 1, 2, 3, and 5. Jenny rolls 3 dice:
3, 4, and 5.
Alice drops the 1, then allocates 6 to success (full
success), and the two advantage traits from the close relationship give three degrees
of success. She allocates the 3 to sacrifice (a minor sacrifice) and the 2 to
story (so Jenny gets to describe the outcome). Norrington wants to find out
whatās going on, because it is affecting himself and the other scoundrels. Jenny
allocates Norrington a āinside informationā single bonus trait for the short
term, he also applies a āconfused feelingsā trait to Frog (situational). The
sacrifice sees Norrington gain a situational āemotionally blackmailedā trait
from Frog.
Jenny also allocates the 5 to success (full success), and
the close relationship gives Frog two advantages too, taking the result to three
degrees of success. She allocates the 4 to sacrifice (a minor sacrifice) and a
3 to the story (a negotiated outcome). Jenny allocates the success, giving
Norrington a ābad memoriesā double penalty trait for the scene explaining that
there was something between the two characters that is starting to make him
uneasy, and also an āangryā single situational penalty trait (this could get
dangerous with the police around). Since Alice gets to describe the sacrifice, she
gives Frog the āStill in Loveā trait.
A second round begins.
I might expand this social conflict element, I'm not sure yet.
Comments